The vast majority of legal evidence specialists are practically united in the opinion that the level of legal consciousness of citizens leaves much to be desired. And the fault of this is not only the lack of a desire to comprehend the basics of law among citizens. An imperfect structure of legislation, many so -called reference norms, often changing the provisions of laws, and a complex language of legal acts, plays a large role here.
Due to the increase in the number of road transport on the country’s roads, the most relevant issues of the interaction of citizens with representatives of the road traffic inspection are. Therefore, the legal course against the lawlessness of the traffic police will be interesting to absolutely any person who manages his own or official vehicles.
Every day, thousands of domestic motorists are faced with a situation when suddenly a black and white wand appears in front of the hood of their car, ordering to stop. Only units of “stopped documents for verification” manage to continue the further path in a good mood. Others are written out by receipts that must be paid for. And in the worst situations, the motorist is unreasonably trying to deprive of their rights, or without abysses they offer to solve a “misunderstanding” on the spot with the help of a certain number of banknotes.
In this situation, the car owner has, as usual, two options. According to the first – you can either pay and forget, or try to prove for many months to prove the wrong inspector in court. The second option involves the solution of the situation in your favor at the stage of stopping the car by a patrol. Of course, not with the help of money, but, thanks to the knowledge of their rights and an algorithm of actions, when these same rights are trying to practice.
Agree, the second option is much more productive and profitable. After all, in the end, you are not so provided to constantly pay bribes or hire a driver when you are deprived of rights.